Tuesday, August 11, 2009

Panic in the Fens

Some of what I was trying to say yesterday, from Joe Sheehan (subscriber only):
There is a lot of panic in Boston this week—heck, there was a lot of panic last week after the trip to St. Petersburg—so perhaps it’s worth it to look at the bigger picture. Even after a six-game losing streak, the Sox are tied for the lead in the wild-card race and have a game-and-a-half edge on the Rays in that race. They have the fourth-best run differential in baseball, and are in a virtual tie for the fifth-best third-order record. Despite the various lineup holes, they have enough talent to fill eight lineup spots well, if they so choose, and are in talks to perhaps patch the shortstop problem. They have an embarrassment of pitching riches, going six starters deep even after a trade and the ending of the Smoltz experiment. And they have a deep and imposing bullpen. This is still one of the best teams in baseball and the favorite to win the AL Wild Card. It’s just going to be a little more dramatic than they would have liked.

Labels: , , ,

|

Thursday, November 01, 2007

"more true than ever that the postseason remains a crapshoot"

I mocked SI's Jon Heyman for saying
The Red Sox disproved the old "crapshoot" theory espoused by a lot of folks who keep losing in the playoffs. The best team won in 2007, and that is no fluke.

Today, Jay Jaffe at Baseball Prospectus looked at the history of "best teams" in the playoffs and concluded that
In other words, it's no cakewalk for even the best of teams, with roughly one in four emerging as champions. It's more true than ever that the postseason remains a crapshoot.

There's no question about which side of that question that I'm on...

Labels: , , ,

|

Monday, October 22, 2007

Championship series - objective ranking wrap-up

I ran the Bill James Playoff Predictor for the Division Series and the Championship Series games. I also looked at the Baseball Prospectus objective ranking system. Here's the wrap-up for the post-season so far. World Series post later today or tomorrow...

Bill James Playoff Predictor was 1-1 in the Championship Series round.

Right:
Boston (100) over Cleveland (39)

Wrong:
Arizona (77) lost to Colorado (30)



Baseball Prospectus' "Secret Sauce", which was 1-3 in the DS round, was 1-1 in the CS round.


Right:

Boston (7.5) over Cleveland (48)

Wrong:

Arizona (29) lost to Colorado (57)


For the post-season so far:

  • Bill James Playoff Predictor
    Boston (79) beat Los Angeles of Anaheim (33)
    Arizona (92) beat Chicago (33)
    Boston (100) over Cleveland (39)

    Wrong:
    New York (83) lost to Cleveland (60)
    Arizona (77) lost to Colorado (30)

    Tie (essentially):
    Colorado (58) beat Philadelphia (59)



  • Baseball Prospectus' "Secret Sauce"
    Right (lower is better):
    Boston (7.5) beat Los Angeles of Anaheim (27.5)
    Boston (7.5) over Cleveland (48)

    Wrong:
    New York (32.5) lost to Cleveland (48)
    Arizona (29) beat Chicago (22)
    Colorado (57) beat Philadelphia (49)
    Colorado (57) over Arizona (29)

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

|

Tuesday, October 09, 2007

DS wrap-up - Bill James Playoff Predictor

How did the Bill James Playoff Predictor do in the Division Series round? It was 2-1-1 (I'm calling the 58-59 Rockies-Phillies prediction a tie.)

Right:
Boston (79) beat Los Angeles of Anaheim (33)
Arizona (92) beat Chicago (33)

Wrong:
New York (83) lost to Cleveland (60)

Tie (essentially):
Colorado (58) beat Philadelphia (59)

It was 2-0 on series where the advantage was over 2:1, 0-1-1 when the advantage was less than 1.5:1.

While it's just a toy, curve-fitting that doesn't necessarily mean much, it had a much better first round than the Baseball Prospectus "Secret Sauce" rankings did. (The sauce "consists of three statistics within the category of pitching and defense — Equivalent Strikeouts Per Nine innings (EqK9), Fielding Runs Above Average (FRAA), and Closer Performance (as measured by the WXRL of the pitcher with the most save opportunities) — that have been demonstrated to have a predictive relationship with success in the post-season.")

Right (lower is better):
Boston (7.5) beat Los Angeles of Anaheim (27.5)

Wrong:
New York (32.5) lost to Cleveland (48)
Arizona (29) beat Chicago (22)
Colorado (57) beat Philadelphia (49)

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

|

Monday, October 01, 2007

Monday Pythagorean - 10/1

The Boston Red Sox are the 2007 AL East division Champions.

- When Okajima and Papelbon blew that 7-2 lead against the Yankees two weeks ago, it resulted in a last week and a half that was a little bit tenser than it otherwise might have been. But the other thing that happened was it put me off by one game on each the Red Sox and Yankees from my pre-season predictions.
"My prediction: The Red Sox win 97 games and the AL East. The Yankees win 93 and the AL Wild Card."
Me, 4/2/07

Final record: The Red Sox win 96 games and the AL East. The Yankees win 94 and the AL Wild Card. Had Okajima and Papelbon held that game, I'd have been exactly right. That NEVER happens...

- I've said repeatedly that you can't predict what will happen in any short series. I believe it. That said, I think that the Red Sox are a better team than the Angels right now, I like the Red Sox offense better, I like the Red Sox starters better and I like the home field advantage. I think that the Red Sox are likely to win this series. But there will be four different divisional playoffs over the course of the next two weeks, and there is no team who will win that will surprise me. That's the way baseball works.

- Over at Baseball Prospectus, Nate Silver has updated the "Secret Sauce" rankings. The BP Secret Sauce consists of three pitching/defense related statistics that have been shown to correlate with post-season success. The best team in baseball? Your Boston Red Sox.

According to the Secret Sauce standings, the ALCS should be Boston vs. New York. Again. The NLCS should be Chicago vs. Philadelphia. And the Red Sox should beat the Cubs in the World Series.

Go ahead. Put money on it. I dare you... ;-)

- I'll have more over the next couple of weeks...













AL Pythagorean Projection Report - 10/1/2007
ProjectedActual

R/G(rank)RA/G(rank)Pythagorean(rank)WLWLLuck

Boston5.35(3)4.06(1)0.624(1)101619666-5

New York5.98(1)4.8(7)0.599(2)97659468-3

Cleveland5.01(6)4.35(3)0.564(3)917196665

Los Angeles5.07(4)4.51(5)0.553(4)907294684

Detroit5.48(2)4.92(9)0.549(5)89738874-1

Toronto4.65(10)4.31(2)0.534(6)87758379-4

Minnesota4.43(12)4.48(4)0.496(7)80827983-1

Oakland4.57(11)4.68(6)0.49(8)79837686-3

Seattle4.9(7)5.02(10)0.489(9)798388749

Texas5.04(5)5.21(12)0.485(10)79837587-4

Kansas City4.36(13)4.8(8)0.456(11)74886993-5

Baltimore4.67(9)5.36(13)0.437(12)71916993-2

Tampa Bay4.83(8)5.83(14)0.415(13)67956696-1

Chicago4.28(14)5.18(11)0.413(14)679572905




Top 5 projections (using current winning %)
Boston9666

Cleveland9666

New York9468

Los Angeles9468

Detroit8874




Top 5 projections (starting with today's record, using Pythagorean winning %)
Boston9666

Cleveland9666

New York9468

Los Angeles9468

Detroit8874




Standings for the week
ProjectedActual

R/G(rank)RA/G(rank)Pythagorean(rank)WLWLLuck

Detroit5.67(5)2.83(1)0.78(1)5133-2

Boston5.83(4)3.83(3)0.683(2)42420

Cleveland4.57(8)3.29(2)0.647(3)5243-1

Texas5.67(5)4.17(5)0.637(4)4233-1

Toronto6.14(3)4.71(7)0.619(5)43521

New York7.43(1)5.71(12)0.618(6)43430

Chicago4.83(7)4.33(6)0.55(7)33421

Seattle4.14(10)3.86(4)0.533(8)43521

Baltimore6.29(2)8(14)0.391(9)34340

Tampa Bay4.5(9)6(13)0.371(10)24240

Kansas City2.86(11)4.71(7)0.286(11)25250

Minnesota2.86(11)4.86(9)0.275(12)25341

Oakland2.8(14)5(10)0.257(13)14140

Los Angeles2.83(13)5.33(11)0.239(14)15241

Labels: , , , , ,

|

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Terry Francona is not a moron.

I've seen and heard a lot of criticism, even condemnation, of Terry Francona for not pulling Gagne after he walked the bases loaded last night. Yes, that was a frustrating game last night. Yes, Gagne has been a disaster. Yes, if your primary goal was winning that game, he should have been pulled before the game-tying walk.

But that obviously isn't the primary goal. Francona's not a moron. If we all can see what's happening, he can see it, too. We've got enough of a track record with him now to be able to understand what's happening. That would never happen in a playoff game. But they aren't playing playoff games yet - they're getting ready to go to the playoffs*. One of the things that they need to do is understand, before they set the rosters, whether Gagne is salvagable or not.

That stunk last night, but going into the post-season with the best record (which they still have, by the way) is not as important as going in with the right roster. As we've seen repeatedly. The only goal of the regular season is to win enough games to be playing in the post-seaons. Period. Sometime in the next few days, the Red Sox will have accomplished that this year.

The last time the team with the best record in baseball won a World Series was in 1998, when the Yankees did it. In the last 5 years, the AL representative in the World Series has gotten into the post-season via the Wild Card 3 times. Last year, the AL sent Detroit to the World Series, a team that led its division all year, had a bigger lead in August than the Red Sox did this year, and ended up losing its division late.

None of that means that I want them to go in as the Wild Card. I haven't given up on the division. I want them to win it, and think that there's some importance to doing so. But it pales in significance to setting the roster. And playing well in the playoffs. Last night's loss, in the grand scheme of things, doesn't mean as much as a win with Gagne getting out of that inning would have. So they left him in.

And prepare yourselves, because it (bringing him into a tight situation late and letting him pitch) is very likely to happen again...


* - And don't even bother with panic talk about how that might keep them out of the playoffs. They're 7 up in the loss column on Detroit with 10 to play, the magic number to clinch a playoff berth is 4. They'll be playing in the playoffs.


Update:
Over at Baseball Prospectus, Joe Sheehan agrees with me (though he's coming at the same question from a different perspective.) [Subscription required]
Look at how Terry Francona has managed his squad all month, in the knowledge that his team is going to October. He’s been resting players all around the roster, diddling with his rotation, and trying experiments like "let’s see how many batters Eric Gagne can walk in one inning." ... I can’t quantify the effects of rest on a player’s performance, but I can say that the cost of doing so—possibly ending up as the wild card versus winning the division—is essentially zero...It doesn’t matter who wins the AL East. It just matters that both the Yankees and the Red Sox stay ahead of the Tigers. As long as both are doing that, there’s no reason to care about who ends up with the better seed.

Labels: , , , , , ,

|