Presidential Debate 3
My live twitter stream (with a few morning-after thoughts interspersed)...
I repeat what I said before 2nd debate - Romney can hurt himself, but Obama can't help himself.
The only question tonight - is Mitt Romney a credible President?
1980s-1950s-1920s line was good. Wrong, but good. Romney needs a response.
Russia is a geo-political foe. 100% correct.
Not going to give Mr. Putin "more flexibility after the election." Instead, more backbone. Good.
[Morning after - This was a great sequence for Mitt, and a great line. But how many people are aware of the "flexibility" quote? It may be one of those lines that should draw blood, but doesn't, because the target audience doesn't recognize the reference. That's not something the mainstream press played up - after all, Obama's not a Republican.]Saying Assad has to go... And that's accomplished what, exactly? Right, exactly nothing...
Does Obama really want to go back to Libya? Is Romney going to let him get away with that?
[Morning after - And the answer is, "yes, Romney let him get away with that." Clearly, the strategy for the evening was not to get confrontational on Libya. Whether to avoid another dose of indignant protestations of virtue from the President or for some other reason, I do not know.]"Our debt is is the biggest national security threat we face..."
"America is stronger now than when I came in to office." What the hell are you talking about?
Math teachers. One of the men on that stage needed math teachers at some point. Or better ones, at the very least...
Obama: "Hey, have you heard that Romney's proposing $5 trillion in tax cuts for the rich?"
Fewer ships...also fewer horse and bayonets... Really? The President of the US thinks that sarcastic snark is a legitimate argument?
[Morning after - some people liked that sequence from the President, thinking that it was a reasonable analogy, because technology has changed. I thought it was a dreadful (and clearly scripted) line and that it made him look very bad as he delivered it, but maybe not...]15 more minutes without a collapse, and Romney wins the election.
Romney's comments on the auto industry in 2008. Romney right, Obama wrong. Or lying. Or both...[Romney's 2008 NYT Editorial about the auto industry]
[Morning after - The President has made this accusation in two debates, and the VP made it in his debate, and it's a blatant lie. Not a misstatement, not a mis-representation, a blatant lie. And the four fact-checkers of the apocalypse are apparently too busy attempting to pin down Paul Ryan's marathon time to pay any attention to it.
You know, if we had taken your advice, Governor Romney, about our auto industry, we'd be buying cars from China instead of selling cars to China...You were very clear that you would not provide government assistance to the U.S. auto companies even if they went through bankruptcy.
- Barack Obama, last nightThe American auto industry is vital to our national interest as an employer and as a hub for manufacturing. A managed bankruptcy may be the only path to the fundamental restructuring the industry needs. It would permit the companies to shed excess labor, pension and real estate costs. The federal government should provide guarantees for post-bankruptcy financing and assure car buyers that their warranties are not at risk.OK? The President is lying.]
- Mitt Romney, 2008
The verdict? Good enough. Basically a draw on the evening, which is all that Romney (the next POTUS) needed...
Like Lehrer in the 1st, Schieffer let the candidates debate. That's a plus for the voters.
Obama's performance tonight didn't do anything at all to break Romney's increasing momentum.
romney looks/sounds like a president
Obama took more time than Romney. Again. Democrats get more time in each of the four debates...RichLowry
Romney finished stronger than he started.
Chris Wallace fact-checks Obama on Iraqi status of forces agreement: Romney was right.
Romney demonstrated that he is Presidential in every way.
Krauthammer: I think it's unequivocal: Romney won, not just tactically but strategically.Will media call Obama on lying - again - about Romney's position on the auto-industry bailout?
If Romney's tied or leading coming in, as seems likely, with the momentum, does tonight change that? No. Ergo Romney win.