1-2 is ... not good. But the sample size is so small that it really doesn't warrant comment.
- The pitching wasn't great, particularly Penny, but it was the offense that was the real problem. Scoring 7 runs in 3 games, in this day and age, is probably going to result in more 0-3s than 2-1s.
- The bottom line from Buccholz' start (5 2/3 innings, 1 run) was pretty good. The details (3 K, 3 BB) were not quite as pretty. On the whole, a solid but unspectacular start against a so-so team.
- I've been pretty positive about the adjustment they made in the pitching rotation. The results thus far suggest [Miniscule Sample Size Warning] that the skipped starts may end up being a negative, as Penny and Lester had both been pitching well before the break, and were less impressive in their first starts (with extended rest) afterwards. [May be coincidence, may mean nothing, but seems worth mentioning.]
- The good news is, if Boston makes it to the World Series, it will once again have home field advantage.
- Red Sox Player of the Week - None. We're talking about a 3-game week in which the team scored 7 runs. No award justified.
- Red Sox Pitcher of the Week - If we were doing this in reverse, the worst pitcher of the week, well Penny would win. But we aren't. Again, absent something spectacular, I'm not going to give one out for a 1-2 week. There was nothing spectacular.
AL Pythagorean Projection Report - 7/20/2009
| | | | | | | Projected | Actual | |
|
---|
| R/G | (rank) | RA/G | (rank) | Pythagorean | (rank) | W | L | W | L | Luck |
|
---|
Boston | 5.19 | (4) | 4.29 | (2) | 0.586 | (1) | 53 | 38 | 55 | 36 | 2 |
|
Tampa Bay | 5.35 | (3) | 4.48 | (5) | 0.58 | (2) | 53 | 39 | 51 | 41 | -2 |
|
New York | 5.54 | (1) | 4.84 | (10) | 0.562 | (3) | 51 | 40 | 54 | 37 | 3 |
|
Los Angeles | 5.36 | (2) | 4.93 | (12) | 0.537 | (4) | 48 | 42 | 52 | 38 | 4 |
|
Toronto | 4.81 | (8) | 4.44 | (4) | 0.536 | (5) | 50 | 43 | 46 | 47 | -4 |
|
Minnesota | 4.83 | (7) | 4.48 | (5) | 0.534 | (6) | 49 | 43 | 47 | 45 | -2 |
|
Texas | 4.88 | (6) | 4.53 | (7) | 0.533 | (7) | 48 | 42 | 49 | 41 | 1 |
|
Detroit | 4.7 | (10) | 4.39 | (3) | 0.531 | (8) | 48 | 42 | 48 | 42 | 0 |
|
Chicago | 4.67 | (11) | 4.68 | (8) | 0.499 | (9) | 45 | 46 | 47 | 44 | 2 |
|
Seattle | 3.95 | (13) | 4.09 | (1) | 0.484 | (10) | 45 | 47 | 49 | 43 | 4 |
|
Cleveland | 4.96 | (5) | 5.52 | (14) | 0.451 | (11) | 42 | 51 | 36 | 57 | -6 |
|
Oakland | 4.18 | (12) | 4.69 | (9) | 0.447 | (12) | 40 | 50 | 38 | 52 | -2 |
|
Baltimore | 4.71 | (9) | 5.32 | (13) | 0.445 | (13) | 40 | 51 | 41 | 50 | 1 |
|
Kansas City | 3.93 | (14) | 4.84 | (10) | 0.407 | (14) | 37 | 54 | 37 | 54 | 0 |
|
Top 5 projections (using current winning %)
Boston | 98 | 64 |
|
New York | 96 | 66 |
|
Los Angeles | 94 | 68 |
|
Tampa Bay | 90 | 72 |
|
Texas | 88 | 74 |
|
Top 5 projections (starting with today's record, using Pythagorean winning %)
Boston | 97 | 65 |
|
New York | 94 | 68 |
|
Tampa Bay | 92 | 70 |
|
Los Angeles | 91 | 71 |
|
Texas | 87 | 75 |
|
Standings for the week
| | | | | | | Projected | Actual | |
|
---|
| R/G | (rank) | RA/G | (rank) | Pythagorean | (rank) | W | L | W | L | Luck |
|
---|
New York | 3 | (10) | 1.67 | (1) | 0.746 | (1) | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
|
Seattle | 3.75 | (7) | 2.5 | (3) | 0.677 | (2) | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
|
Toronto | 3.33 | (9) | 2.33 | (2) | 0.658 | (3) | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
|
Los Angeles | 5.25 | (4) | 3.75 | (7) | 0.649 | (4) | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
|
Minnesota | 4 | (5) | 3 | (4) | 0.629 | (5) | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
|
Tampa Bay | 5.33 | (3) | 4 | (9) | 0.629 | (6) | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
|
Baltimore | 7 | (1) | 6 | (13) | 0.57 | (7) | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 |
|
Chicago | 6 | (2) | 7 | (14) | 0.43 | (8) | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
|
Texas | 3 | (10) | 4 | (9) | 0.371 | (9) | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
|
Kansas City | 4 | (5) | 5.33 | (12) | 0.371 | (9) | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | -1 |
|
Oakland | 3.75 | (7) | 5.25 | (11) | 0.351 | (11) | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
|
Boston | 2.33 | (13) | 3.33 | (6) | 0.342 | (12) | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
|
Cleveland | 2.5 | (12) | 3.75 | (7) | 0.323 | (13) | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
|
Detroit | 1.67 | (14) | 3 | (4) | 0.254 | (14) | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | -1 |
|
Labels: MLB, pythagorean, Red Sox
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Comment?
<< Home